It's the liberal cooptative masks on the face of sexist hate and fear, worn by real nice guys we all know and like, right? We have met the enemy and he's our friend. And dangerous.

Here's a link.

They were a bit busy but finally met in 1848 in Seneca Falls, New York to call the first women's rights convention  . . . and you know the rest.  And some good men were there as well.  But most of the boyz among the reformers more than 150 years ago only mocked the women and the very concept of women's rights and, most laughable of all, woman suffrage.

"It's Hillary's fault that Obama lost."

John Aravosis has been helpful enough to say this explicitly, in advance.  Kos has implied it on several occasions (before I stopped reading him).

Feminazi (also spelled femi-Nazi or femme-nazi) is a pejorative term used to characterize feminists. It is used predominantly in North America by social conservatives to refer to feminists whom they perceive as intolerant of conservative views.[1][2][3][4] The term does not relate to the National Socialist Women's Organization or any other organization of women who served Nazi Germany.

Popularized by Rush Limbaugh

The term was popularized by conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, who credited his friend Tom Hazlett, a professor of law and economics at George Mason University, with coining the term.[4] Limbaugh originally stated that the word "feminazi" not only referred to an extreme feminist but to a woman whose goal was that there should be as many abortions as possible, saying at one point that there were fewer than twenty-five true feminazis in the U.S.[7]

Though Limbaugh has claimed these limits to the definition of the term, in practice he has employed it in a much wider context. For example, on April 26, 2004, Limbaugh said, "Some funny comments from the femi-Nazis at the pro-abortion rally in Washington yesterday. Not many. It didn't take long for us to put together our montage, but we'll let you hear it when we come back." Limbaugh referred to the March for Women's Lives.[8] The march's organizers estimated that 1.15 million people attended.[9]

Limbaugh has also used the term to refer to members of the National Center for Women and Policing, the Feminist Majority Foundation, and the National Organization for Women -- which has over 500,000 members.[10][11][12]

Among those named as "Femi-Nazis" was noted Women's Gender and Sexuality scholar, and author of "Reading Oprah: How Oprah's Book Club Changed the Way America Reads," Cecilia Konchar Farr.

IACF that he said what he said in SF.

IACF that he gets completely trounced by McCain.

I think I read somewhere where Sen. Obama would not let Michelle take a job until he approved of it.

Sexism is deeply ingrained in most men.

A couple of days ago I would have said, I won't vote for Obama, and you can do what you want.

The dynamic was striking.  Almost all the women claimed to like both candidates and to be torn between them.  But a large number of the men were quite open about coming out and saying that they didn't think the Presidency was a job for a woman.  Some of them, and this is the part that really amazes me, had no reservations about saying that right there in front of their family.  I can't even imagine what my daughter would think if she heard her father say something like that.

McCaskill? Sebelius?  Pelosi?

It's much less remarked that an awful lot of liberal women are appalled at how Hillary has been treated during this campaign and that some of them might stay home as well if she doesn't win.

In what way has Hillary been treated that you consider appalling? If she was not so willing to do anything and say anything to win and more of a uniting charamastic post-partisan speaker like Barack, she wouldn't be treated this way. Unfortunately liberal women are low information voters, so it's no wonder they get upset at the the slightest criticism of Hillary.

I'm hoping it's parody, but given so much of what I've read like this, I don't think it is.  And the number of commenters who seem to feel the need to declare that Hillary has not, in any way, been subject to sexism or misogyny is just weird.  One can presumably admit the sexist attacks against Clinton and still vote for Obama.  I'm not an Obama supporter, but even I could come up with positive reasons to support him that do not rely on painting Hillary as teh evil through sexist attacks.  So I don't understand the need to deny they exist.  Psychologists adn socioligists are going to have a field day with this election for generations.

And then there are the folks who have apparently never read an exit poll:

Many young voters will stay home, or be out having fun, regardless of who wins the nomination. The risk is with the lower income, usually marginalized voters who have become energized by Sen. Obama's campaign staying home. Their support for Sen. Obama scares the Wall Street Democrats and Republicans, who would prefer these voters either vote for the candidates the elites have chosen or stay home.

Yes, that's Clinton's general election problem, she can't figure out how to get poor and working class whites to vote for her.  Oh, wait...

The creative class is a class of workers whose job is to create meaningful new forms. The creative class is composed of scientists and engineers, university professors, poets and architects, to name a few. Their designs are widely transferable and useful on a broad scale, as with products that are sold and used on a wide scale. Another sector of the creative class includes those positions which are knowledge intensive. These careers usually require a high degree of formal education.

As to the post by this just-clued in guy, all I can say is, "NO FREAKIN' DUH!!!!"  I might also add, I don't think most women thought we were in a post-feminist world - I think men just wanted to CLAIM we were so they wouldn't have to deal with their sexism (or women their internal misogyny).  Frankly, I thought things had gotten worse in the past 10 yrs or so, not better.  That young women haven't a CLUE what we went through to get them even Title IX is telling and sad.  I think most young women are not taught women's history, certainly not recent history, and it shows.  They have no idea how hard many of us fought for the things they now take for granted...

As for your point about women not having stamina. You  must be very young. Any woman who got into medical school in the 60s and 70s was both smarter and stronger than most of the men.  They didn't get if they weren't the first and they didn't stay if they weren't the second.  I can still out-stamina most, if not all, younger men in the OR.  Some of it comes with practice.  Some with bloodymindedness.

Babies?  Worked until the last 2 weeks, except for the last who came early, and returned 2 weeks later.  No more than a long vacation which many male physicians take also.  Not saying you have to do this, but if you're in solo practice it may be necessary - and quite possible. Women who go home to one or two toddlers after a birth work just as hard. [If you live in a small town the patients will come and knock on the house door.]

I personally know women in every surgical subspecialty including ortho and cardio.   Every one of them is just as technically adept and able to perform all the surgical techniques that the men can do.