She has a petition for writ of cert pending challenging her conviction and sentence. You can read it here. The questions presented:

Where the actions of petitioner – a criminal defense lawyer – consisted of publicly disseminating the protected speech of her incarcerated client, did her convictions for providing material support to a conspiracy violate the First Amendment and render 18 U.S.C. § 2339A unconstitutional as applied under Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder, which was decided as a facial First Amendment challenge.

Do the First Amendment and Due Process bar punishing a defendant more harshly based upon the content of her speech about matters of public concern, made outside of the courthouse, to the public and press?

Should the doctrine of “chilling effect,” whereby others are discouraged from exercising a constitutional right, be limited solely to statutes and government regulations, or does it apply to judicial decisions as well?

These are the orders she is appealing:

• United States v. Stewart, 590 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2009).

• United States v. Stewart, 686 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2012)

All of the trial transcripts and legal pleadings are available here.

All of Our coverage of her trial and appeals is accessible here.